Vol. 4, Ed. 11 - Costumes are top commodities. "The Fog" is the top box office draw. And more dentist appointments are scheduled this time of year, than any other. It's October. And we are in the midst of horror season. So slide in your plastic vampire teeth and grab you candy bag. We are about to go trick-or-treating through the world of screenwriting.

 

http://www.scriptshark.com/insider/Home.asp/nsc/contest/

The Nashville Screenwriters Conference is pleased to announce the second National Screenplay Showdown. The Screenplay Showdown was created to honor the work of the best new screenwriters from around the country, and to serve as a bridge between those writers and the Hollywood film industry. The Showdown evaluates screenplays solely on the basis of storytelling ability -- all story genres have the same chance of winning. Three winners will be chosen in each of two categories:

  1. All Genre scripts
  2. Music-themed scripts

Both first place winners will receive a trip to the 2006 Nashville Screenwriters Conference, two nights hotel accommodations and $250.00 spending money. The two winners will also enjoy the perks of the Conference’s Silver Screen Pass, which includes admittance to the VIP Party, a great opportunity to meet and mingle with top industry professionals. The total value of the first place prize in each category is over $1,400.00.






Biography:
WES CRAVEN

A former humanities professor turned brand name fright-master, producer, writer, director Craven is clearly an intellectual artist trapped in a disreputable genre. He entered filmmaking as an editor and assistant producer to exploitation producer Sean Cunningham (who would later create Jason for the "Friday the 13th" movies) on several low-budget comedies and skin flicks before graduating to the position of writer-director with a modestly budgeted ($87,000), feature "Last House on the Left" (1972). Still a potent shocker, this grimly realistic tale of rape, murder, and revenge was loosely based on Ingmar Bergman's 1960 classic, "The Virgin Spring". The intensity of the film shocked many--Leonard Maltin's "Movie Guide" damns it as "repugnant" and "really sick"--including its creator.

Craven spent the next five years working as a film editor and unproduced screenwriter. He tried his hand at numerous genres including biopic, war, romance, and comedy but there were no takers. Finally as his savings ran out, a reluctant Craven accepted an offer to make another horror film. His infamy in polite filmgoing circles grew with the extraordinary thriller "The Hills Have Eyes" (1977). Brought in for an impressive $225,000, this profoundly troubling tale of an All-American family becalmed in the desert and beset by cannibalistic mutants became a genre classic of the 1970s. According to the British magazine TIME OUT, "exploitation themes are used to maximum effect.... A heady mix of ironic allegory and seat-edge tension." For better or worse, Craven was firmly typed as a horror filmmaker.

Four years passed before Craven was able to complete another feature, but he did manage to helm a TV-movie "Stranger in Our House" (NBC, 1978) starring B-queen Linda Blair in a tale of teenage witchcraft. He returned to features with "Deadly Blessing" (1981), an uneven but frightening tale of a woman terrorized by a rural religious sect. (This project may have had a personal dimension for the filmmaker. Craven himself was the product of a strict fundamentalist Baptist upbringing that taught that movies were a tool of the Devil. In fact he did not see his first film until college.)

Craven finally gained some measure of success and industry clout with "A Nightmare on Elm Street" (1984), in which the horrific Freddy Krueger haunts the dreamscapes of small-town American teens. The hard-edged and strikingly surreal original was followed by five popular and increasingly campy sequels. The franchise generated over a half a billion dollars but the creator received a paltry $400,000 after signing away his rights so as to secure the director's chair for the first film. Nonetheless, having his name associated with the successful series led to expanded career opportunities.

Craven began working regularly in TV in the mid-80s. His projects included helming first season episodes of the 1985 CBS revival of "The Twilight Zone" and the TV-movie "Chiller" (CBS, 1985), and creating and producing the short-lived anthology series "The Nightmare Cafe" (NBC, 1992), which reunited Craven with "Elm Street" star Robert Englund. His next feature, the oddball teen horror romance "Deadly Friend" (1986), was seriously marred by censorship and studio interference. "The Serpent and the Rainbow" (1988), an ambitious and atmospheric but ultimately half-baked period piece set in a pre-revolutionary Haiti, has its fair share of admirers.

Craven attempted (and failed) to create another Freddy Krueger in serial killer Horace Pinker, the persistent villain of the engagingly silly thriller "Shocker" (1989). He attempted to comment on the exploitation of the poor in "The People Under the Stairs" (1991), with uneven results. Craven finally returned to classic filmmaking form with "Wes Craven's New Nightmare" (1994). He crafted a complex and highly reflexive narrative about the nature and function of horror films that incorporated dreams he had while making the film. Set in the "real" world of filmmaking, he and his main stars played themselves in a project that felt like "The Player" with a bigger body count. Craven wisely eliminated the camp aspects that had overtaken the series, and it garnered some respectful notices. The same cannot be said for his follow-up feature, a relatively high-profile horror comedy vehicle for Eddie Murphy, then in the midst of a serious career slump.

Unlike his last Freddy opus, "Vampire in Brooklyn" (1996) was clearly a work-for-hire assignment for Craven. A horror fan himself, Murphy contacted the genre auteur with a script he had co-written with his brothers. Though marketed as "a comic tale of horror and seduction", the film played like an uneven vampire outing with moments of comic relief. Both press and public were unimpressed and the film found an early grave. Nonetheless, Craven emerged from the project not only unscathed but on something of a roll. The following year found him with half a dozen projects in various stages of development. Craven helmed, but did not script, "Scream" (1996), a mainstream comedy-thriller hit boasting a fashionable young cast that included Courteney Cox, Drew Barrymore and David Arquette. While such a project was clearly good for Craven's ascendant career as an industry player, longtime fans may feel that something vital had been lost. Nevertheless, he was on to a new franchise, helming the concluding installments "Scream 2" (1997) and "Scream 3" (2000). In between, Craven completed an unusual project, "Music of the Heart" (1999), a biopic of music teacher Roberta Guispari-Tzavaras who had been profiled in the 1995 Oscar-nominated documentary "Small Wonders" with Meryl Streep.

After a short hiatus from the big screen Craven re-teamed with the "Scream" screenwriter Kevin Williamson for the werewolf thriller "Cursed" (2005) starring Christina Ricci, but the film's fangs were not able to take much of a bite out of the box office. Much better--indeed, his best film since the first "Scream"--was his follow-up thriller "Red Eye" (2005), which featured a resourceful hotel employee (Rachel McAdams) secretly menaced on a red-eye flight by a mysterious stranger threatening her father's life. Craven again showed his extrodinary skill in building suspense and crafting scares while still respecting his audience's intelligence.

  • Education: Wheaton College & Johns Hopkins University - creative writing and philosophy MA 1964 attended on full scholarship to the Johns Hopkins Graduate Writing Seminars, studying under the Baltimore poet-scholar Eliot Coleman; earned degree in one year
  • Milestone: 1984 Wrote and directed the popular and influential feature, "A Nightmare on Elm Street"; inaugurated a $500 million grossing film franchise 
All data from Baseline-StudioSystems.  For more information on writers, directors, actors, and producers, please visit BaselineFT.
 



10% Off Coverage
Through November 30, 2005

Click Here

 


2005 FINALISTS ANNOUNCED:

Project Title
Author(s)
Almost An American:
Cat Bistransin
Brazen:
Akiva Penaloza
Change of Dreams:
Jim Barnes
Elephant and Castle:
Wilmer Linn
Prision of the Damned:
Nicole Jones

....................

2006 Contest

Submissions begin February 1st, 2006.

Next Year's ScriptShark Insider Screenplay Competition
will include several new things - including a special gift for signing up!

Visit The Insider


 


The Mechanics of Fear
A Look at the Construction of Horror Screenplays

“Wanna see something really scary?” - Twilight Zone: The Movie

We all like to be scared, right? Well, okay, some of us do. And based on box office numbers from the past few years, quite a few of us do. Usually shot at break-neck speed, with budget limitations in mind, Horror films have established and nurtured their core, niche audience - younger folks that like to scream and squeal. And the result is a thriving genre that annually proves to be one of the most consistent investments in the film industry.

Horror films have long been extremely lucrative. From low-budget Corman-esque slasher flicks to the more studio-friendly Japanese, supernatural remakes, this brand of celluloid fills theater seats without breaking the bank. Take, for instance, the 2004 Halloween hit “The Grudge.” The total negative cost was budgeted around $10 million, and the film raked in $110 million. Similarly, the teen-friendly “Final Destination” series rallied approximately $50 million in negative costs, but watched domestic box office revenue soar to over $100 million. And we’re not even assessing International box office, DVD, or cable licenses.

But perhaps the most impressive financial benefit to the Horror genre is its ability to repurpose long-standing franchises over the course of long periods of time – just take a look at movies such as “The Fly” or “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.” Most film historians considered the latter of which a solid franchise through the 70’s and early 80’s. But the recent 2003 remake took Leatherface to new heights – bringing in a whopping domestic box office total of $80 million. The continuation of the franchise not only survived, but flourished. And business entities in the film world have long been aware of this - just look at successful franchises such like “Friday the 13th,” “A Nightmare On Elm Street,” and “Halloween.” Each of these film series began in the late 70’s/ early 80’s and have successfully released films with their franchise character within the last 2 years.

But what, exactly, is so entertaining about fear?

Good screenwriters know that fear generates a core emotional response that actually changes the body’s chemical response for a small period in time. This shift inside an audience, in turn, creates thrilling moments in which their participation actually engages them physically with the stories on the screen. This is because horror films are emotion-based experiences. And while there are certainly exceptions to the rule, most movies within this genre worry less about plot development and focus more on the eliciting this specific emotional reaction. To do this, they employ several tried-and-true techniques:

Set-up and Pay-off

At one point in time, we have all probably yelled out – “Don’t go in there!” But the character does… and they usually get what we paid to see. Much like comedies, horror films set an audience up for an emotional experience by introducing elements that will later pay off in a ‘horrific’ beat. This set-up, however, isn’t just about triggering the final beat, rather it builds tension throughout the scene to really punch the final moment and elicit a genuine scare from the audience.

Sense of Predation

At our core, we are all animals. And while the trappings of society have made it easier for us to protect ourselves from more natural predators such as lions, tigers, and bears (oh my!), the instinct to avoid becoming prey is layered deep into our psyche. Good horror films, in turn, tap into this exact emotional experience. They often create viscerally dangerous situations, allowing the audience to share in the experience of being hunted with the main characters. Additionally, the audience is usually provided more knowledge of a given situation than the lead character. As a result, the fear is heightened and the pay-off is much more intense.

The Antagonist

Because a horror film’s antagonist plays the key role in driving audiences to the theater, these movies are not usually bound to movie star participation. These flicks know that the real star of the film is the ghost, killer, or dangerous creature lurking behind every corner. Creating a unique antagonist with even more unique approaches to malevolence is not only applauded, but required. So much so, in fact, most horror franchises are defined by their villain, “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre” being case and point.

Types of Horror Films

So, let’s take a look at some of the popular structures for horror films. While many of these certainly cross the lines into other sub-genres, most horror flicks fall into the four following categories:

Creature Feature - A key element driving this type of horror script is its ability to create the sense of being hunted. Perhaps this is because it plays on some very primal notions – at the core we are just animals. Creature Features – horror films featuring non-human antagonists – exploit this over and over again. That universal sensation is based on an ancient predatory fear that lies deep within most animals below the top of the food chain. It stems from one of our most basic desires – survival.

  • Key Features:
    • Predatory base – sense of being hunted
    • Savage killings by savage beasts
    • Plays on the fear of being eaten alive
    • Employs unexpected response from antagonist
  • Example Films:
    • “Alien”
    • “Jaws”
    • “Dawn of the Dead”

Slasher Flicks - This sub-genre is very closely related to the Creature Feature. In theory many of the principles are the same – the predatory base, the savagery, and certainly the unpredictable response. But what makes this group of films especially scary is their ability to put a recognizable face on the killer. Rather than becoming animal food, victims in these horror films fall prey to the whimsy of “human animals” – villains dedicated to killing for fun and without remorse.

  • Key Features:
    • The Killer is often in close proximity to the victims
    • Antagonist understands basic human constructions
    • Inventive use of tools and weapons
    • Crazy people often act out without deeper motive
  • Example Films:
    • “Scream Trilogy”
    • “ Texas Chainsaw Massacre”
    • “Halloween”

Supernatural Horror - This is often called the Haunted House genre. Usually restricted by location and cultural ‘rules,’ this sub-genre preys on the viewers’ fear of the unknown. Generating a number of unpredictable responses and linking them to deep-set mythology, this group of films dates back to stories around the campfire.

  • Key Features:
    • Usually tied to cultural mythology
    • Antagonist’s abilities extend beyond those of basic human constructions
    • Exuberant use of the fear of the unknown
    • Often tied to a single location
  • Example Films:
    • The Grudge
    • The Ring
    • Final Destination

Psychological Horror - Usually slow, methodical, and maddening, psychological horror films often examine the breakdown of sanity in the main character. These stories highlight the darker side of humanity and tend to save gore for the other genres. A much more subtle journey into evil this type of horror exhibits understated film techniques and long, sickeningly quiet moments.

  • Key Features:
    • Examination into the madness of a human
    • Exploration of the inner mind
    • Subtle and methodical filming and scoring techniques
    • Charming villains who appear to be approachable
  • Example Films:
    • The Shining
    • Jacob’s Ladder
    • The Silence of the Lambs

 



Presents:

Development Snapshot
New projects in D at the studios:

SOLITAIRE
Writer:
Kelly Eskridge
Producer:
Bo Hyde, Kendall Morgan
Production Co:
Cherry Road Pics
Studio:
Warner Independent
Logline: A special child, a powerful symbol of a new world government is destined for greatness. But two months before she is to assume the role she has been preparing for her entire life, the young teenager discovers that everything she believes, everything she is, is a lie.
   
ON BEAUTY
Writer:
Zadie Smith
Producer:
Allison Owen, Scott Rudin
Production Co:
Scott Rudin Productions
Studio:
Film Four
Logline:Two professors share a bitter rivalry in the academic world and have a strong dislike for one another, yet members of their two families begin to intermingle.
   
JUVENILE
Writer:
Brian Gunn, Mark Gunn
Producer:
Mary Parent, Scott Stuber, Steve Carrell
Production Co:
Stuber Productions
Studio:
Universal Pictures
Logline: The most Caucasian suburban man in America is sent to juvenile prison for a petty crime he committed as a kid, and is suddenly surrounded by 11-year-old bad-asses.
   
AMUSEMENT
Writer:
Jake Wade Wall
Production Co:
Michael Macari, Neal Edelstein
Director:
Beranard Rose
Studio:
New Line Cinema
Logline: A traumatized woman is questioned by a cop and a psychiatrist about three stories involving a clown, a hotel and a convoy, that involve her and two of her female friends from childhood.
....................

All data from Baseline-StudioSystems.  For more information on writers,
directors, actors, and producers, please visit BaselineFT.
 

The entertainment industry's ultimate searchable archive of intellectual property. With thousands of professionals using Baseline for their daily business needs, the stage is set for The Spec Market to become the most important new talent discovery system available to writers.

*Targeted browsing provides direct professional access to your material.
*Superb system architecture shapes effective professional search patterns.
*Attractive new design to make your project look professional.
*Detailed information on your work provides professional accessibility.
*Advanced searches give your material an opportunity to be discovered by executives and reps.
*Submit any type of filmed entertainment: features, television, and even media-based projects.

LEARN MORE

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90034
Off this list: Email: scriptjournal@filmtracker.com
with unsubscribe in the subject line